March 2010 Newsletter
March 9, 2010 by Jean Keener, CRPC, CFDP · Leave a Comment
The March 2010 Newsletter is now available. It includes an investment market update, Part II in my series on how to tap into your home equity in retirement, considerations in evaluating an early retirement offer, information on 2009 tax deduction for 2010 Haitian relief contributions, 2011 tax rate proposals found in the federal budget, credit card act provisions, and a reminder on the deadline to take advantage of the home buyers credit. Click here to read it.
February 2010 Newsletter
February 9, 2010 by Jean Keener, CRPC, CFDP · Leave a Comment
The February newsletter is now available. It includes an update on January stock and bond market performance, the first article in a two-part series on how to tap into your home equity for retirement income, a preview of a new financial planning service, and more. Click here to read the newsletter.
January 2010 Newsletter
January 12, 2010 by Jean Keener, CRPC, CFDP · Leave a Comment
The January 2010 newsletter is now available. Beginning in 2010, it will be published the second week of each month. This month’s newsletter includes a brief 2009 market update, an update on the estate tax for 2010, how to conduct a home inventory, and more. Click here to read it.
December 2009 Newsletter
December 3, 2009 by Jean Keener, CRPC, CFDP · Leave a Comment
The December 2009 newsletter is now available. It includes a market update, tips on tracking your expenses, year-end investing moves designed to save on taxes, and more. Click here to read the newsletter.
November 2009 Newsletter
November 5, 2009 by Jean Keener, CRPC, CFDP · Leave a Comment
The November newsletter is now available. It includes a market update, 2010 retirement plan contribution limits, and more. Click here to view it.
Who should consider Roth conversion
September 18, 2009 by Jean Keener, CRPC, CFDP · 2 Comments
Given the historic opportunity of 2010 to spread the tax payment over 2 years in 2011 and 2012, everyone with a traditional IRA should take at least one look at Roth IRA conversion for next year.
It is most beneficial to you when all of these apply:
- You’ll pay the resulting “conversion” tax with non-IRA funds
- You have 10 years or more before you will be taking distributions from the Roth IRA
- You will be in the same or a higher tax bracket when you start taking those distributions.
But even if only some or none of these apply, it doesn’t mean you should rule conversion out.
There are still many times where it can make sense, and some that don’t. It’s easiest to discuss these by looking at few examples.
I did an analysis for a 64-year-old who didn’t have the money to pay the tax with non-IRA funds, so the taxes were going to come out of his IRA. He also only had 6 years until he planned to start taking distributions. He was going to be in the same tax bracket in 2011-2012 and in retirement. In his situation, he still came out ahead with conversion – having over $1,000 more in after-tax retirement income by converting. He won’t be subject to the 10% penalty on the amount withdrawn to pay the tax because he is over 59 ½. His situation was also helped by not planning to take social security until age 70. If he was already receiving social security benefits, we would have needed to consider any additional income tax implications on his social security benefits for the years he claimed the conversion income.
Another analysis was for a 32-year-old woman. She has a pre-tax employer
401k and was also trying to decide if conversion made sense. She also does not have the funds to pay the taxes with non-401k money, and she would be subject to the 10% penalty by withdrawing funds from the 401k before age 59 ½ to pay the taxes. We estimated her tax bracket in 2011-2012 and in retirement as the same. In her case, conversion did not make sense. But it was quite close. If she believed that her tax rates were going to be higher by the time she retired by even 1%, the conversion would have significantly increased her after-tax income.
One last example – 44 year old. He had a traditional IRA and had money to pay the taxes from a non-IRA account. However, we estimated that his tax bracket in retirement would likely be lower than it is now, by about 3%. In his case, conversion was still a great deal even with the projected lower retirement tax rate. Having all those years of after-tax growth more than off-set the potential for a slightly lower rate in retirement.
If you have a traditional IRA, an analysis is in order.
The above examples illustrate that even when your situation doesn’t meet the “ideal conversion” criteria, it still may make a significant difference in your after-tax retirement income. If you’d like to see the specific calculations on any of the examples listed above, please feel free to contact me and I’d be happy to send them to you.
A few other considerations to keep in mind
If your estate is potentially subject to the estate tax, a Roth conversion can be a powerful planning tool.
The market’s relative “high” or “low” value when you convert is also a factor in how good a deal conversion is – low values mean you pay tax on a lower amount.
There are also opportunities to convert in early 2010 and undo the conversion later based on circumstances or market performance. We’ll discuss this in future posts.
Paying the Bills: Potential Sources of Retirement Income
August 18, 2009 by Jean Keener, CRPC, CFDP · Leave a Comment
Planning your retirement income is like putting together a puzzle with many different pieces. One of the first steps in the process is to identify all potential income sources and estimate how much you can expect each one to provide.
Social Security
According to the Social Security Administration (SSA), more than 9 of 10 people aged 65 or older receive Social Security benefits. However, most retirees also rely on other sources of income.
The SSA sends you an estimate of your benefits each year. The closer you are to full retirement age, the more accurate that estimate will be. For a rough estimate, you can use the calculator on the Social Security website (http://ssa.gov).
Your Social Security retirement benefit is calculated using a formula that takes into account your 35 highest earnings years. How much you receive ultimately depends on a number of factors, including when you start taking benefits. You can begin doing so as early as age 62. However, your benefit may be 20% to 30% less than if you waited until full retirement age (65 to 67, depending on the year you were born).
As you’re planning, remember that the question of how Social Security will meet its long-term obligations to both baby boomers and later generations has become a hot topic of discussion. Concerns about the system’s solvency indicate that there’s likely to be a change in how those benefits are funded, administered, and/or taxed over the next 20 or 30 years. That may introduce additional uncertainty about Social Security’s role as part of your overall long-term retirement income picture, and put additional emphasis on other potential income sources.
Pensions
If you are entitled to receive a traditional pension, you’re lucky; fewer Americans are covered by them every year. Be aware that even if you expect pension payments, many companies are changing their plan provisions. Ask your employer if your pension will increase with inflation, and if so, how that increase is calculated.
Your pension will most likely be offered as either a single or a joint and survivor annuity. A single annuity provides benefits until the worker’s death; a joint and survivor annuity provides reduced benefits that last until the survivor’s death. The law requires married couples to take a joint and survivor annuity unless the spouse signs away those rights. Consider rejecting it only if the surviving spouse will have income that equals at least 75% of the current joint income. Be sure to fully plan your retirement budget before you make this decision.
Work or other income-producing activities
Many retirees plan to work for at least a while in their retirement years at part-time work, a fulfilling second career, or consulting or freelance assignments. Obviously, while you’re continuing to earn, you’ll rely less on your savings, leaving more to accumulate for the future. Work also may provide access to affordable health care.
Be aware that if you’re receiving Social Security benefits before you reach your full retirement age, earned income may affect the amount of your benefit payments until you do reach full retirement age.
If you’re covered by a pension plan, you may be able to retire, then seek work elsewhere. This way, you might be able to receive both your new salary and your pension benefit from your previous employer at the same time. Also, some employers have begun to offer phased retirement programs, which allow you to receive all or part of your pension benefit once you’ve reached retirement age, while you continue to work part-time for the same employer.
Other possible resources include rental property income and royalties from existing assets, such as intellectual property.
Retirement savings/investments
Until now, you may have been saving through retirement accounts such as IRAs, 401(k)s, or other tax-advantaged plans, as well as in taxable accounts. Your challenge now is to convert your savings into ongoing income. There are many ways to do that, including periodic withdrawals, choosing an annuity if available, increasing your allocation to income-generating investments, or using some combination. Make sure you understand the tax consequences before you act.
Some of the factors you’ll need to consider when planning how to tap your retirement savings include:
- How much you can afford to withdraw each year without exhausting your nest egg. You’ll need to take into account not only your projected expenses and other income sources, but also your asset allocation, your life expectancy, and whether you expect to use both principal and income, or income alone.
- The order in which you will tap various accounts. Tax considerations can affect which account you should use first, and which you should defer using.
- How you’ll deal with required minimum distributions (RMDs) from certain tax-advantaged accounts. After age 70½, if you withdraw less than your RMD, you’ll pay a penalty tax equal to 50% of the amount you failed to withdraw.
Some investments, such as certain types of annuities, are designed to provide a guaranteed monthly income (subject to the claims-paying ability of the issuer). Others may pay an amount that varies periodically, depending on how your investments perform. You also can choose to balance your investment choices to provide some of both types of income.
Inheritance
One widely cited study by economists John Havens and Paul Schervish forecasts that by 2052, at least $41 trillion will have been transferred from World War II’s Greatest Generation to their descendants. (Source: Why the $41 Trillion Wealth Transfer Is Still Valid) An inheritance, whether anticipated or in hand, brings special challenges. If a potential inheritance has an impact on your anticipated retirement income, you might be able to help your parents investigate estate planning tools that can minimize the impact of taxes on their estate. Your retirement income also may be affected by whether you hope to leave an inheritance for your loved ones. If you do, you may benefit from specialized financial planning advice that can integrate your income needs with a future bequest.
Equity in your home or business
If you have built up substantial home equity, you may be able to tap it as a source of retirement income. Selling your home, then downsizing or buying in a lower-cost region, and investing that freed-up cash to produce income or to be used as needed is one possibility. Another is a reverse mortgage, which allows you to continue to live in your home while borrowing against its value. That loan and any accumulated interest is eventually repaid by the last surviving borrower when he or she eventually sells the home, permanently vacates the property, or dies. (However, you need to carefully consider the risks and costs before borrowing. A useful publication titled “Reverse Mortgages: Avoiding a Reversal of Fortune” is available online from the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.)
If you’re hoping to convert an existing business into retirement income, you may benefit from careful financial planning to minimize the tax impact of a sale. Also, if you have partners, you’ll likely need to make sure you have a buy-sell agreement that specifies what will happen to the business when you retire and how you’ll be compensated for your interest.
With an expert to help you identify and analyze all your potential sources of retirement income, you may discover you have more options than you realize.
August 2009 newsletter
August 5, 2009 by Jean Keener, CRPC, CFDP · Leave a Comment
The August newsletter is now available. It includes information on 2010 social security and medicare numbers for planning purposes, whether creditors can go after your 401(k) and more. To view it, click here.
Couples, Investing, and Risk
July 21, 2009 by Jean Keener, CRPC, CFDP · Leave a Comment
It’s pretty common for spouses to be at different points on the risk tolerance spectrum. If you’re one of these couples, you know that these differences can have varying effects on the relationship and your investing behavior.
Sometimes, the more conservative spouse just completely delegates investing decisions to the other spouse and just shuts their eyes when the statement comes. This is not the ideal solution because it’s important for both spouses to be educated on your investments in case something happens to the decision-making spouse. Lack of information can lead to stress and poor decisions with long-term consequences in this situation.
Other times, there’s a constant state of friction and stress whenever investments are discussed. The more conservative investor may veto anything that sounds the slightest bit risky. Or the more aggressive investor may rush to make investing decisions without fully explaining or researching the risk to the more conservative spouse. This approach is also clearly not what you want in your relationship!
The bottom line is … You can have differences in this area and still work quite productively together on investing. In fact, you can use your differences to prompt each other to thoroughly research and discuss each investment option resulting in better investment decisions. So how do you get to this point?
First, define your goals
Making good investment decisions is difficult if you don’t know what you’re investing for. Making sure you’re on the same page–or at least reading from the same book–when it comes to financial goal-setting is the first step toward dealing jointly with investments.
Make sure the game plan is clear
Making sure both spouses know how and (equally important) why their savings are invested in a certain way can help minimize marital blowback if investment choices don’t work out as anticipated. Second-guessing rarely improves any relationship; making sure both partners understand from the beginning why an investment was chosen, as well as its risks and potential rewards, may help moderate the impulse to say “I told you so” later.
If you’re the more aggressive investor …
Take time to understand your spouse’s concerns. You may need to provide additional information to increase his or her comfort level, but you won’t know what to supply if you automatically dismiss any objections. If you’re enthusiastic about an investment, concealing potential pitfalls could make future joint decisions more difficult if your credibility suffers because of a loss. A more cautious spouse may help you remember to assess the risks involved.
Remember that you can make changes in your portfolio gradually; you don’t have to become more aggressive all at once. And if you’re an impulsive investor, try not to act until you can consult your partner.
If you’re the more conservative investor …
If you’re unfamiliar with a specific investment, research it. Though past performance is no guarantee of future returns, understanding how an investment typically has behaved in the past or how it compares to other investment possibilities could give you a better perspective on why your spouse is interested in it.
Consider whether there are investments that are less aggressive than what your spouse is proposing but that still push you out of your comfort zone and might represent a compromise position. For example, if you don’t want to invest a large amount in a single stock, a mutual fund that invests in that sector might be a way to compromise. (Before investing in a mutual fund, carefully consider its investment objective, risks, charges, and expenses, which can be found in the prospectus available from the fund. Read it carefully before investing.)
What if you still can’t agree?
You could consider investing a certain percentage of your combined resources aggressively, an equal percentage conservatively, and a third percentage in a middle-ground choice. This would give each partner equal input and control of the decision-making process, even if one has a larger balance in his or her individual account.
Another approach is to use separate asset allocations to balance competing interests. If both spouses have workplace retirement plans, the risk-taker could invest the largest portion of his or her plan in an aggressive choice and put a smaller portion in an option with which a spouse is comfortable. The conservative partner would invest the bulk of his or her money in a relatively conservative choice and put a smaller piece in a more aggressive selection on which you both agree.
Or you could divide responsibility for specific goals. The more conservative half could be responsible for the money that’s being saved for a house down payment in five years. The other partner could take charge of longer-term goals that may benefit from taking greater risk in pursuit of potentially higher returns. You also could consider setting a predetermined limit on how much the risk-taker can put into riskier investments.
Finally, a neutral third party with some expertise and a dispassionate view of the situation may be able to help work through differences.
If you and your partner have worked through investing differences, I’d love to hear what’s worked for you. Please feel free to post a comment!
Free Financial Webinars
July 10, 2009 by Jean Keener, CRPC, CFDP · 3 Comments
The National Association of Personal Financial Advisors is starting a new series of free webinars on various financial topics including Money 101, Kids & Money, Investing Basics, Protecting What you Have, and more. These sessions are designed to provide a convenient, accessible way to get financial information to help you most effectively manage your finances. Each one is instructed by one of my fellow NAPFA members. The first session is August 7. For the full schedule and to RSVP, visit NAPFA’s website.