March 2010 Newsletter
March 9, 2010 by Jean Keener, CRPC, CFDP · Leave a Comment
The March 2010 Newsletter is now available. It includes an investment market update, Part II in my series on how to tap into your home equity in retirement, considerations in evaluating an early retirement offer, information on 2009 tax deduction for 2010 Haitian relief contributions, 2011 tax rate proposals found in the federal budget, credit card act provisions, and a reminder on the deadline to take advantage of the home buyers credit. Click here to read it.
February 2010 Newsletter
February 9, 2010 by Jean Keener, CRPC, CFDP · Leave a Comment
The February newsletter is now available. It includes an update on January stock and bond market performance, the first article in a two-part series on how to tap into your home equity for retirement income, a preview of a new financial planning service, and more. Click here to read the newsletter.
Getting the Most of Employer Matching
January 19, 2010 by Jean Keener, CRPC, CFDP · Leave a Comment
Many employers have reduced or eliminated matching in the past several years. If you’re fortunate enough to still have a match, you want to take full advantage of this potentially significant boost to your retirement plans. Every dollar your employer contributes toward your retirement is a dollar you don’t have to.
To make the most of employer matching, you need to answer two questions:
- What’s the formula?
- How does my employer handle “maxing out” — reaching the federal limits of $16,500 for 401(k) plans for those under 50, and $22,000 for those 50+ — before the end of the year?
The first part – understanding the formula — is usually the easy part. Once you know the formula, you need to contribute at least as much as they match if at all possible. A common formula is 100% up to 3% and then 50% on the next 2% — so you would need to contribute a minimum of 5% to get the full match. Other times, employers match up to 6%, 10% or more, so your contributions to make the most of the match are higher.
The next part – answering the max out question — can get more complex. Sometimes the most aggressive and well-intentioned savers actually hurt themselves by completing their full contribution before the end of the year. Companies have several choices in how they approach calculating your match, and it all really depends on your plan’s summary plan description. Here are some of the ways it’s handled:
- If you don’t make a contribution in a particular pay period, no match for that pay period. This way can result in forfeited matching contributions if you don’t spread your deferrals out over the whole year.
- The employer spreads your “earned” match out over the entire year regardless of how early in the year you max out your contributions. This way never results in forfeited matching.
- Employer stops matching when your contributions max out, but then “trues up” their match early the following year.
As you can see, front-loading your contributions doesn’t hurt you in the second and third scenarios, but can reduce your match significantly in the first scenario. To find out how your company handles it, read your plan description or make a call to your 401(k) provider or benefits departments. Then make sure you time your contributions to comply with your company’s practices on awarding the full match. It’s also a good idea to monitor your paycheck stubs and retirement plan account statements to ensure that matches are happening correctly.
With saving enough for retirement an increasingly big challenge, it’s important to take full advantage of every bit of help we can get.
Pension Max: Is it right for you?
December 15, 2009 by Jean Keener, CRPC, CFDP · Leave a Comment
If you’re near retirement and have a pension, you may be considering a pension max strategy. With all the variables involved, it can be challenging to determine if it’s really in your best interest.
First – what is pension max?
Pension max is used by married couples to increase their net retirement income while still protecting the surviving spouse’s income in the event the pension recipient dies first. Basically, the pension recipient elects a single life pension instead of one with a survivor benefit for their spouse. This results in a higher monthly pension benefit. Then the pension recipient purchases life insurance to allow the surviving spouse to replace the pension income in the event that the pension recipient dies first. In some situations, this approach can result in a higher net retirement income if the cost of the needed life insurance is less than the increased pension benefits.
Pension max always results in more premiums for the insurance company, but doesn’t always result in more income for you. How do you decide if it’s in your best interest?
First — at the risk of stating the obvious — if you’re not married, there’s no reason to consider it. Depending on your estate goals and health, there may be other strategies that make sense.
Second – the health and age of the pension recipient matters a great deal. If the pension recipient is in excellent health and can likely qualify for preferred life insurance rates, pension max has a lot better chance of being a good idea.
Third – you need to determine how much and what kind of life insurance is needed to replace the income. As the pension recipient gets older, less life insurance death benefit will be required to replace the pension income. Usually some combination of tiered term-life policies and a small amount of permanent insurance fit the bill.
Fourth – the surviving spouse should have an idea of how they will use the life insurance death benefit to replace the pension income. For many, a single-premium immediate annuity makes the most sense, however other draw-down investment scenarios can also be considered.
Fifth – you need to consider taxes in your calculations on both the life insurance benefit and the increased pension benefit.
- Life insurance death benefits are generally not subject to income taxes. With an unlimited marital exemption, the estate tax will not be an issue when the first spouse dies. However, depending on the overall size of the estate and the death benefit, it could be an issue when the second spouse dies.
- The increased pension benefit will be subject to income taxes. So when you’re comparing the net effect on your income, you need to calculate how much your pension will be worth after taxes because you will be paying the life insurance premiums with after-tax dollars. This is an easy area to ignore, but depending on your tax bracket the effect of taxes can make or break the plan.
Sixth – consider the convenience factor. If there’s just a very small financial benefit to using a pension max strategy in your situation, it may still make sense to forego it. You need to weigh the simplicity of just taking the pension against the extra effort of going through life insurance underwriting and paying the premiums ongoing.
If you’re seriously considering using a pension max strategy, it’s a good idea to have an uninterested third party talk through the analysis with you. A fee-only financial advisor who doesn’t have a big insurance commission at stake based on your decision will be able to offer objective advice. And even though you spend some money on the advice, it may help you save much more over the long term and at very least feel confident that you made the right decision based on your unique situation.
2010 Key Numbers
December 2, 2009 by Jean Keener, CRPC, CFDP · Leave a Comment
The key numbers guide from Forefield has been updated for 2010. Not a lot of changes from last year, but still a convenient reference. It includes limits on retirement plan contributions, tax brackets, tax credit and deduction phase-outs, social security benefits, medicare, and much more. 2010 Key Numbers
November 2009 Newsletter
November 5, 2009 by Jean Keener, CRPC, CFDP · Leave a Comment
The November newsletter is now available. It includes a market update, 2010 retirement plan contribution limits, and more. Click here to view it.
Funding early retirement
October 26, 2009 by Jean Keener, CRPC, CFDP · Leave a Comment
Most are familiar with the magic ages of 59 ½ when you can start withdrawing from retirement savings without paying the 10% IRS penalty and 62 when you can start taking social security. But sometimes retirement comes before these ages either voluntarily or involuntarily, and you may need income. In those situations, many are not aware that you still have options to tap your retirement savings without penalties.
The first option is available if you are at least age 55 and you stop working for your employer. If your employment terminates during or after the year you turn 55, you are eligible to start drawing funds from that employer’s 401(k) without penalty. If you have multiple retirement accounts, this exception doesn’t apply to all of them. It only applies to those employer retirement accounts where you “separate from service” after turning 55. If you roll the employer plan funds into an IRA, the exception also no longer applies. For qualified public safety employees who take a distribution from a government defined benefit plan, this exception kicks in at age 50.
Another option is called “substantially equal period payments” or 72(t) distributions. You can start taking funds from your retirement accounts (401(k), IRA, 403(b), etc.) at any age with this option, although it doesn’t apply to any employer retirement plans when you’re still working for that employer. To use this option, you are required to begin taking a “substantially equal” amount each year and continue without variation for at least 5 years or until you reach age 59 ½ (whichever comes later). You have a choice of 3 different calculation methods of your payment. Once you start, you are committed to using the same method for the duration of the payments, with the exception of one adjustment allowed from two of the methods to the third one.
The IRS is quite picky about the precise calculations of 72(t) distributions and imposes steep penalties for any mistakes. An error in one year can cause back-penalties on all previous distributions taken. So you really need to consult a professional to have your distributions calculated. And once you start, you absolutely have to stick with the program.
With either of these options, it’s important to look at the big picture of your overall retirement funding. Starting to withdraw from your savings too early can result in a significantly reduced standard of living later on, or it may be just fine in your situation.
Of course, you will still owe taxes on any distributions taken from tax-deferred accounts, and it’s a good idea to plan for those taxes when considering these strategies.
Quoted in Dallas Morning News on 2010 Roth conversions
October 25, 2009 by Jean Keener, CRPC, CFDP · Leave a Comment
I had the opportunity to talk with Pamela Yip, personal finance columnist at the Dallas Morning News, a couple weeks back about 2010 Roth IRA conversions. Her article provides a good synopsis of the changes for 2010, and quotes me on when conversion makes the most sense. Click here to read the article.
Partial Roth Conversion Strategy
October 13, 2009 by Jean Keener, CRPC, CFDP · Leave a Comment
When people find out how much tax they would have to pay to convert their IRA from traditional to Roth, it’s often times a conversion show stopper. Even if all the analysis shows that conversion would be clearly beneficial to their after-tax retirement income levels or provide estate planning benefits, there’s a gigantic psychological hurdle with writing a check to the IRS sooner rather than later. However, the conversion decision can become more attractive when you realize it’s not an all or nothing decision. You can choose to convert just part of your traditional IRA balance.
How do you decide how much to convert?
One reasonable way of determining how much to convert is doing enough to take you to the top of your current tax bracket without going into the next one. You might also determine how much of a tax bill you would be willing to pay, and then calculate the conversion amount based on that. For most, one of these two options will create the most appealing results.
There is a third option in the “fancy financial footwork” category.
This third option will result in far too much paperwork for many individuals to want to deal with it, especially for a smaller traditional IRA balance. But if you have a larger IRA – say $50,000 or more – the extra work might be worth the tax savings. Conversion is not an irrevocable decision until you get to the tax filing deadline of the next year (October 15 for most people). This 21-month window from January 2010 until the deadline to “recharacterize” the conversion creates a Roth Segregation Opportunity, pioneered by David Marotta of Marotta Wealth Management in Virginia and written up in a recent Financial Planning Magazine article.
Using the Roth Segregation Strategy, you convert your entire traditional IRA balance in January 2010. Let’s say the balance is $100,000 for easy math. Instead of putting the entire conversion in one account, you put $20,000 in each of 5 accounts. Each of these 5 accounts is invested in a different equity asset class – you might do 20% large cap growth, 20% large cap value, 20% small cap, 20% developed international, and 20% emerging markets. Then, around the beginning of October 2011, you assess which of these asset classes has performed the best. You keep the converted IRA with the best performance and recharacterize each of the other 4 back to traditional IRAs. This limits your tax liability (payable on 2011 and 2012 tax returns) to just the taxes on the $20,000. Of course, if multiple asset classes performed extremely well, you might choose to keep more of the conversions. Or if they all declined in value, you would likely recharacterize them all.
This strategy is not a simple one. It requires a lot of analysis and rigorous tracking of the paperwork to ensure that everything is completed properly. You would also want to ensure that going with such an aggressive equity allocation in your IRA over the 21-month period made sense within the larger context of your portfolio, time horizon, and risk tolerance. And for those that plan to do a full conversion vs. a partial, there’s no benefit to setting up all the different accounts.
But for those of you who relish a little financial creativity and don’t mind complexity, this can be a pretty cool opportunity to analyze and implement – and unique to the 2010 opportunity to spread taxes over 2011 and 2012.
October 2009 Newsletter
October 2, 2009 by Jean Keener, CRPC, CFDP · Leave a Comment
The October newsletter is now available. It includes a reminder about the October 15 deadline to recharacterize 2008 Roth IRA conversions, a market update, how to calculate your net worth and why net worth is the financial number to watch, and more. To read the newsletter, click here.