February Personal Finance Newsletter
February 14, 2011 by Jean Keener, CFP, CRPC, CFDS · Leave a Comment
The February personal finance newsletter is now available. In addition to the investing market update, the topics are:
- Extension of tax-free charitable contribution option from IRAs for those over 70 1/2
- New cost basis reporting rules (important for those with taxable investment accounts)
- Summary of the health care law provisions going into effect this year
Click here to read the newsletter.
Quoted in Dallas Morning News on 2010 Roth conversions
October 25, 2009 by Jean Keener, CFP, CRPC, CFDS · Leave a Comment
I had the opportunity to talk with Pamela Yip, personal finance columnist at the Dallas Morning News, a couple weeks back about 2010 Roth IRA conversions. Her article provides a good synopsis of the changes for 2010, and quotes me on when conversion makes the most sense. Click here to read the article.
Partial Roth Conversion Strategy
October 13, 2009 by Jean Keener, CFP, CRPC, CFDS · Leave a Comment
When people find out how much tax they would have to pay to convert their IRA from traditional to Roth, it’s often times a conversion show stopper. Even if all the analysis shows that conversion would be clearly beneficial to their after-tax retirement income levels or provide estate planning benefits, there’s a gigantic psychological hurdle with writing a check to the IRS sooner rather than later. However, the conversion decision can become more attractive when you realize it’s not an all or nothing decision. You can choose to convert just part of your traditional IRA balance.
How do you decide how much to convert?
One reasonable way of determining how much to convert is doing enough to take you to the top of your current tax bracket without going into the next one. You might also determine how much of a tax bill you would be willing to pay, and then calculate the conversion amount based on that. For most, one of these two options will create the most appealing results.
There is a third option in the “fancy financial footwork” category.
This third option will result in far too much paperwork for many individuals to want to deal with it, especially for a smaller traditional IRA balance. But if you have a larger IRA – say $50,000 or more – the extra work might be worth the tax savings. Conversion is not an irrevocable decision until you get to the tax filing deadline of the next year (October 15 for most people). This 21-month window from January 2010 until the deadline to “recharacterize” the conversion creates a Roth Segregation Opportunity, pioneered by David Marotta of Marotta Wealth Management in Virginia and written up in a recent Financial Planning Magazine article.
Using the Roth Segregation Strategy, you convert your entire traditional IRA balance in January 2010. Let’s say the balance is $100,000 for easy math. Instead of putting the entire conversion in one account, you put $20,000 in each of 5 accounts. Each of these 5 accounts is invested in a different equity asset class – you might do 20% large cap growth, 20% large cap value, 20% small cap, 20% developed international, and 20% emerging markets. Then, around the beginning of October 2011, you assess which of these asset classes has performed the best. You keep the converted IRA with the best performance and recharacterize each of the other 4 back to traditional IRAs. This limits your tax liability (payable on 2011 and 2012 tax returns) to just the taxes on the $20,000. Of course, if multiple asset classes performed extremely well, you might choose to keep more of the conversions. Or if they all declined in value, you would likely recharacterize them all.
This strategy is not a simple one. It requires a lot of analysis and rigorous tracking of the paperwork to ensure that everything is completed properly. You would also want to ensure that going with such an aggressive equity allocation in your IRA over the 21-month period made sense within the larger context of your portfolio, time horizon, and risk tolerance. And for those that plan to do a full conversion vs. a partial, there’s no benefit to setting up all the different accounts.
But for those of you who relish a little financial creativity and don’t mind complexity, this can be a pretty cool opportunity to analyze and implement – and unique to the 2010 opportunity to spread taxes over 2011 and 2012.
Who should consider Roth conversion
September 18, 2009 by Jean Keener, CFP, CRPC, CFDS · 2 Comments
Given the historic opportunity of 2010 to spread the tax payment over 2 years in 2011 and 2012, everyone with a traditional IRA should take at least one look at Roth IRA conversion for next year.
It is most beneficial to you when all of these apply:
- You’ll pay the resulting “conversion” tax with non-IRA funds
- You have 10 years or more before you will be taking distributions from the Roth IRA
- You will be in the same or a higher tax bracket when you start taking those distributions.
But even if only some or none of these apply, it doesn’t mean you should rule conversion out.
There are still many times where it can make sense, and some that don’t. It’s easiest to discuss these by looking at few examples.
I did an analysis for a 64-year-old who didn’t have the money to pay the tax with non-IRA funds, so the taxes were going to come out of his IRA. He also only had 6 years until he planned to start taking distributions. He was going to be in the same tax bracket in 2011-2012 and in retirement. In his situation, he still came out ahead with conversion – having over $1,000 more in after-tax retirement income by converting. He won’t be subject to the 10% penalty on the amount withdrawn to pay the tax because he is over 59 ½. His situation was also helped by not planning to take social security until age 70. If he was already receiving social security benefits, we would have needed to consider any additional income tax implications on his social security benefits for the years he claimed the conversion income.
Another analysis was for a 32-year-old woman. She has a pre-tax employer
401k and was also trying to decide if conversion made sense. She also does not have the funds to pay the taxes with non-401k money, and she would be subject to the 10% penalty by withdrawing funds from the 401k before age 59 ½ to pay the taxes. We estimated her tax bracket in 2011-2012 and in retirement as the same. In her case, conversion did not make sense. But it was quite close. If she believed that her tax rates were going to be higher by the time she retired by even 1%, the conversion would have significantly increased her after-tax income.
One last example – 44 year old. He had a traditional IRA and had money to pay the taxes from a non-IRA account. However, we estimated that his tax bracket in retirement would likely be lower than it is now, by about 3%. In his case, conversion was still a great deal even with the projected lower retirement tax rate. Having all those years of after-tax growth more than off-set the potential for a slightly lower rate in retirement.
If you have a traditional IRA, an analysis is in order.
The above examples illustrate that even when your situation doesn’t meet the “ideal conversion” criteria, it still may make a significant difference in your after-tax retirement income. If you’d like to see the specific calculations on any of the examples listed above, please feel free to contact me and I’d be happy to send them to you.
A few other considerations to keep in mind
If your estate is potentially subject to the estate tax, a Roth conversion can be a powerful planning tool.
The market’s relative “high” or “low” value when you convert is also a factor in how good a deal conversion is – low values mean you pay tax on a lower amount.
There are also opportunities to convert in early 2010 and undo the conversion later based on circumstances or market performance. We’ll discuss this in future posts.
Paying the Bills: Potential Sources of Retirement Income
August 18, 2009 by Jean Keener, CFP, CRPC, CFDS · Leave a Comment
Planning your retirement income is like putting together a puzzle with many different pieces. One of the first steps in the process is to identify all potential income sources and estimate how much you can expect each one to provide.
Social Security
According to the Social Security Administration (SSA), more than 9 of 10 people aged 65 or older receive Social Security benefits. However, most retirees also rely on other sources of income.
The SSA sends you an estimate of your benefits each year. The closer you are to full retirement age, the more accurate that estimate will be. For a rough estimate, you can use the calculator on the Social Security website (http://ssa.gov).
Your Social Security retirement benefit is calculated using a formula that takes into account your 35 highest earnings years. How much you receive ultimately depends on a number of factors, including when you start taking benefits. You can begin doing so as early as age 62. However, your benefit may be 20% to 30% less than if you waited until full retirement age (65 to 67, depending on the year you were born).
As you’re planning, remember that the question of how Social Security will meet its long-term obligations to both baby boomers and later generations has become a hot topic of discussion. Concerns about the system’s solvency indicate that there’s likely to be a change in how those benefits are funded, administered, and/or taxed over the next 20 or 30 years. That may introduce additional uncertainty about Social Security’s role as part of your overall long-term retirement income picture, and put additional emphasis on other potential income sources.
Pensions
If you are entitled to receive a traditional pension, you’re lucky; fewer Americans are covered by them every year. Be aware that even if you expect pension payments, many companies are changing their plan provisions. Ask your employer if your pension will increase with inflation, and if so, how that increase is calculated.
Your pension will most likely be offered as either a single or a joint and survivor annuity. A single annuity provides benefits until the worker’s death; a joint and survivor annuity provides reduced benefits that last until the survivor’s death. The law requires married couples to take a joint and survivor annuity unless the spouse signs away those rights. Consider rejecting it only if the surviving spouse will have income that equals at least 75% of the current joint income. Be sure to fully plan your retirement budget before you make this decision.
Work or other income-producing activities
Many retirees plan to work for at least a while in their retirement years at part-time work, a fulfilling second career, or consulting or freelance assignments. Obviously, while you’re continuing to earn, you’ll rely less on your savings, leaving more to accumulate for the future. Work also may provide access to affordable health care.
Be aware that if you’re receiving Social Security benefits before you reach your full retirement age, earned income may affect the amount of your benefit payments until you do reach full retirement age.
If you’re covered by a pension plan, you may be able to retire, then seek work elsewhere. This way, you might be able to receive both your new salary and your pension benefit from your previous employer at the same time. Also, some employers have begun to offer phased retirement programs, which allow you to receive all or part of your pension benefit once you’ve reached retirement age, while you continue to work part-time for the same employer.
Other possible resources include rental property income and royalties from existing assets, such as intellectual property.
Retirement savings/investments
Until now, you may have been saving through retirement accounts such as IRAs, 401(k)s, or other tax-advantaged plans, as well as in taxable accounts. Your challenge now is to convert your savings into ongoing income. There are many ways to do that, including periodic withdrawals, choosing an annuity if available, increasing your allocation to income-generating investments, or using some combination. Make sure you understand the tax consequences before you act.
Some of the factors you’ll need to consider when planning how to tap your retirement savings include:
- How much you can afford to withdraw each year without exhausting your nest egg. You’ll need to take into account not only your projected expenses and other income sources, but also your asset allocation, your life expectancy, and whether you expect to use both principal and income, or income alone.
- The order in which you will tap various accounts. Tax considerations can affect which account you should use first, and which you should defer using.
- How you’ll deal with required minimum distributions (RMDs) from certain tax-advantaged accounts. After age 70½, if you withdraw less than your RMD, you’ll pay a penalty tax equal to 50% of the amount you failed to withdraw.
Some investments, such as certain types of annuities, are designed to provide a guaranteed monthly income (subject to the claims-paying ability of the issuer). Others may pay an amount that varies periodically, depending on how your investments perform. You also can choose to balance your investment choices to provide some of both types of income.
Inheritance
One widely cited study by economists John Havens and Paul Schervish forecasts that by 2052, at least $41 trillion will have been transferred from World War II’s Greatest Generation to their descendants. (Source: Why the $41 Trillion Wealth Transfer Is Still Valid) An inheritance, whether anticipated or in hand, brings special challenges. If a potential inheritance has an impact on your anticipated retirement income, you might be able to help your parents investigate estate planning tools that can minimize the impact of taxes on their estate. Your retirement income also may be affected by whether you hope to leave an inheritance for your loved ones. If you do, you may benefit from specialized financial planning advice that can integrate your income needs with a future bequest.
Equity in your home or business
If you have built up substantial home equity, you may be able to tap it as a source of retirement income. Selling your home, then downsizing or buying in a lower-cost region, and investing that freed-up cash to produce income or to be used as needed is one possibility. Another is a reverse mortgage, which allows you to continue to live in your home while borrowing against its value. That loan and any accumulated interest is eventually repaid by the last surviving borrower when he or she eventually sells the home, permanently vacates the property, or dies. (However, you need to carefully consider the risks and costs before borrowing. A useful publication titled “Reverse Mortgages: Avoiding a Reversal of Fortune” is available online from the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.)
If you’re hoping to convert an existing business into retirement income, you may benefit from careful financial planning to minimize the tax impact of a sale. Also, if you have partners, you’ll likely need to make sure you have a buy-sell agreement that specifies what will happen to the business when you retire and how you’ll be compensated for your interest.
With an expert to help you identify and analyze all your potential sources of retirement income, you may discover you have more options than you realize.
Year End Tax Planning Techniques
December 3, 2008 by Jean Keener, CFP, CRPC, CFDS · Leave a Comment
Many tax provisions that had already expired or were scheduled to expire at the end of the year were extended as part of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, signed into law on October 3, 2008. Included in the list of extended provisions is an additional one year alternative minimum tax (AMT) “patch,” eliminating a level of uncertainty that would otherwise have plagued many individuals as they reviewed their year-end tax situation. As always, year-end presents both an opportunity and a challenge when it comes to tax planning. But keep in mind that the window of opportunity for many taxsaving moves closes on December 31.
The basics: timing is everything
Year-end tax planning is as much about the 2009 tax year as it is about the 2008 tax year. There’s a real opportunity for tax savings when you can predict that you’ll be paying taxes at a lower rate in one year than in the other. If that’s the case, some simple year-end moves can pay off in a big way.
Unless you think you’ll be in a higher bracket next year, look for opportunities to defer income to 2009. For example, you may be able to defer a year-end bonus, or delay the collection of business debts, rents, and payments for services. Similarly, you may be able to accelerate deductions into 2008 by paying some deductible expenses such as medical expenses, interest, and state and local taxes before year end.
Delay income / Accelerate deductions
- Delay collection of business debts, rents, and payments for services (if you use the cash method of accounting)
- Defer compensation/year-end bonus if possible
- Defer sale of capital gain property or take installment payments instead of lump-sum payment
- Postpone retirement plan distributions that aren’t required
- Make next year’s charitable contribution this year instead
- Pay medical expenses that are due in January before the end of the year
- Prepay deductible interest and property tax
- Make first quarter installment payment of state estimated tax in December
- Accelerate alimony payments
AMT: What you don’t know could hurt you
If you’re subject to the alternative minimum tax (AMT), traditional year-end maneuvers, like deferring income and accelerating deductions, can actually hurt you. The AMT–essentially a separate federal income tax system with its own rates and rules–effectively disallows a number of itemized deductions, making it a significant consideration when it comes to year-end moves. For example, if you’re subject to the AMT in 2008, prepaying 2009 state and local taxes won’t help your 2008 tax situation, but could hurt your 2009 bottom line.
The Emergency Economic Stabilization Act brought the latest in a long series of temporary “fixes” for AMT, but this patch (which includes increased AMT exemption amounts), expires at the end of the year. It’s likely that a more permanent solution will be implemented next year, but the specifics of such a permanent solution are uncertain.
There’s also good news for many who have been subject to AMT in prior years, particularly those caught in the AMT web as a result of exercising incentive stock options in the past. The Stabilization Act makes the calculation of the AMT refundable credit amount more taxpayer-friendly (through 2012), and eliminates the phase-out of the refundable credit amount for individuals with higher adjusted gross incomes. The Act also provides for an abatement of outstanding tax balances owed as of October 3, 2008, attributable to the AMT treatment of incentive stock options. The bottom line? Consider carefully your AMT situation for 2008 in light of the recent changes.
IRA and retirement plan opportunities
Traditional IRAs (assuming that you qualify to make deductible contributions) and employer-sponsored retirement plans such as 401(k) plans allow you to contribute funds pretax, reducing your 2008 income. Contributions you make to a Roth IRA (assuming that you meet the income requirements) or a Roth 401(k) aren’t deductible, so there’s no tax benefit for 2008, but qualified Roth distributions are completely free from federal income tax–making these retirement savings vehicles very appealing.
For 2008, the maximum amount that you can contribute to a 401(k) plan is $15,500, and you can contribute up to $5,000 to an IRA. If you’re age 50 or older, you can contribute up to $20,500 to a 401(k) and up to $6,000 to an IRA. The window to make 2008 contributions to your 401(k) closes at the end of the year, while you can generally make 2008 contributions to your IRA until April 15, 2009.
For some, it may make sense to think past 2008 and 2009: If you qualify, consider whether it makes sense to convert some or all of your traditional IRA assets to a Roth IRA. Funds that you convert, to the extent that the funds represent investment earnings and deductible contributions, are considered taxable income. Nevertheless, the potential future tax benefit could outweigh the current tax bill.
New and extended provisions
The Emergency Economic Stabilization Act also extended several popular provisions that had expired or were set to expire. To the extent that they apply to you, be sure to factor these items into your year-end analysis:
- For 2008 and 2009, you’ll continue to have the option to deduct state and local general sales tax (instead of state and local income tax) on your Schedule A.
- The above-the-line deduction (maximum $4,000 deduction) for qualified higher education expenses, and the above-the-line deduction for up to $250 of out-of-pocket classroom expenses paid by education professionals, are also extended through 2009.
- Taxpayers age 70½ or older now have through 2009 to make charitable contributions of up to $100,000 directly from an IRA to a qualified charity, without including the distribution in income.
- Beginning this year (and continuing for 2009 as well), individuals who do not itemize deductions are able to claim an additional standard deduction of up to $500 ($1,000 for married couples filing jointly) for real estate property taxes paid.
Energy efficient home improvements
A credit of up to $500 for the purchase of energy efficient home improvements (e.g., insulation, exterior windows and doors) and energy efficient property (e.g., qualified furnaces) expired at the end of 2007.
The Emergency Economic Stabilization Act reinstated the credit, but only for property placed in service during 2009. While limited in scope–for example, the credit is capped at $200 for windows, and $150 for qualified furnaces–the credit offers an opportunity for savings. If you’re eligible for the credit, and plan on making a qualifying improvement or purchase, waiting until 2009 to do so might make sense in order to qualify for the credit.